http://blog.4rev.net/2008-10/do-identical-twins-have-different-fingerprints/ 4 REV NET Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:30:49 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blog.4rev.net/2008-10/do-identical-twins-have-different-fingerprints/comment-page-1/#comment-51319 byrev Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:06:07 +0000 http://blog.4rev.net/?p=6079#comment-51319 Oh... yes ...it was my mistake !!! The Answer is definitely YES. Oh… yes …it was my mistake !!! The Answer is definitely YES.

]]> http://blog.4rev.net/2008-10/do-identical-twins-have-different-fingerprints/comment-page-1/#comment-51314 Jackers :D Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:04:47 +0000 http://blog.4rev.net/?p=6079#comment-51314 I agree with the Joe guy above. Please change your conclusion for future people who will use this site as an important reference. I agree with the Joe guy above. Please change your conclusion for future people who will use this site as an important reference.

]]> http://blog.4rev.net/2008-10/do-identical-twins-have-different-fingerprints/comment-page-1/#comment-50732 Erin Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:56:25 +0000 http://blog.4rev.net/?p=6079#comment-50732 Yeah, you got that wrong there with the double negative. Yeah, you got that wrong there with the double negative.

]]> http://blog.4rev.net/2008-10/do-identical-twins-have-different-fingerprints/comment-page-1/#comment-50563 joe Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:35:06 +0000 http://blog.4rev.net/?p=6079#comment-50563 It looks like you made an error in your conclusion......the article points to non-genetic origins for fingerprints, yet you conclude that the twins do not have different fingerprints, therefore they are identical. Which is false. It looks like you made an error in your conclusion……the article points to non-genetic origins for fingerprints, yet you conclude that the twins do not have different fingerprints, therefore they are identical. Which is false.

]]>